I intend too, but it's a bit irritating that there is so much confusion when it really isn't that neccessary
For example, Narrative Question: How can Elinda hold a Phone with her mantis arms? Answer: Because it's a HANDS-FREE phone. Most people would just be annoyed by the pun, and not consider that lots of monsters wouldn't have hands, so obviously someone would invent a phone that doesn't need thumbs, right? Elinda could still scratch her phone badly, sure, but it's a logic that holds regardless of what is thrown at it.
Also "Anon is not a character", while technically true as a argument (projections arn't characters), probably should be revised to "Anon is HIDING things about his character", because it makes anon more drawable and it fits with Anonymous nature: to hide as much information about yourself as possible. Depending on what I want to do with Wosyet, it's even possible that information on anons identity is "Sacred" - it's supposed to be hidden away and protected, so the story itself might not even be able to touch it (which is why his name is auto-censored in panel 1)
And I've noticed a weird thing accuring lately in that nobody thinks PB, the porn character, would want to fuck Anon, the guy custom-made to be a lady love machine, so have a meme. I mean come on, is it so hard to imagine that PB, who would climb buildings and trees and mountains to get what she wants, wouldn't climb onto Anon's dick given the right circumstances and motivation?